I am writing from my best friend's apartment in Abilene, Texas. I've been here now since late on Saturday night. Since I've been back in Texas, I've seen several people and we've remarked about the surrealistic experience it has been. Firstly, I wonder if it's common only to me, or to the physical, emotional or spiritual nomad in general to find multiple affinities? To unpack that a little so it doesn't sound quite so annoying would be to ask whether everyone has multiple homes?
There's an obvious element to that; in the fact that most people have several life compartments that are unique to them, that come to form their full image of self. A quick Google search on multiple home lives will bring up several blogs about "Multiple me", "Multiple online lives" and general nods at our duplicity. Moms blog about their kids, about going back to school, technology buffs discuss the latest Linux platforms, etcetera, etcetera. So, it is a pretty well established concept that people exist in several arenas.
What happens when it is more than just an element to life, but rather life itself? I am really hoping not just to talk at it, but to learn something by asking this question of the abyss. I know that I have several areas of my life that are simply spaces in which I exist, but then I have these places that come to define me. I used the term duplicity earlier because I am, at the moment really interested in the potential disconnection between those defining spaces.
One of the lives or the homes that I'm talking about could be where most people have more than one group of friends, and those, along with work colleagues, church members and neighbours to name a few, make up their multiple self. I guess one of my questions is whether you find yourself either having several unrelated life subgroups or if you try to blend groups. Which one is more comfortable? The compartmentalised self that exists fairly independently of the image in a different compartment, or the de-compartmentalised self that attempts to maintain a general frame while augmenting the elements of you that help particular subgroups relate more - or less - to you?
For example, if you're an academic, do you discuss interesting new research with everyone in your life or do you talk about sports, or the fact that Oprah is ending? If you are an equal opportunity socialiser, are you as (insert racial description here) with one group as you are with another? If you're religious, do you infuse that across all your environments?
I am a person in pursuit and deeply desirous of a genuine existence. That being said, I have no assertion for you on whether it is good or bad to maintain separation or attempt to blend lifestyles. The only thing I might say is that perhaps there are situations where one is more appropriate. I think that perhaps my definition of home is a place where I am received favourably by my environment while successfully and honestly communicating an element of me.
There's an obvious element to that; in the fact that most people have several life compartments that are unique to them, that come to form their full image of self. A quick Google search on multiple home lives will bring up several blogs about "Multiple me", "Multiple online lives" and general nods at our duplicity. Moms blog about their kids, about going back to school, technology buffs discuss the latest Linux platforms, etcetera, etcetera. So, it is a pretty well established concept that people exist in several arenas.
What happens when it is more than just an element to life, but rather life itself? I am really hoping not just to talk at it, but to learn something by asking this question of the abyss. I know that I have several areas of my life that are simply spaces in which I exist, but then I have these places that come to define me. I used the term duplicity earlier because I am, at the moment really interested in the potential disconnection between those defining spaces.
One of the lives or the homes that I'm talking about could be where most people have more than one group of friends, and those, along with work colleagues, church members and neighbours to name a few, make up their multiple self. I guess one of my questions is whether you find yourself either having several unrelated life subgroups or if you try to blend groups. Which one is more comfortable? The compartmentalised self that exists fairly independently of the image in a different compartment, or the de-compartmentalised self that attempts to maintain a general frame while augmenting the elements of you that help particular subgroups relate more - or less - to you?
For example, if you're an academic, do you discuss interesting new research with everyone in your life or do you talk about sports, or the fact that Oprah is ending? If you are an equal opportunity socialiser, are you as (insert racial description here) with one group as you are with another? If you're religious, do you infuse that across all your environments?
I am a person in pursuit and deeply desirous of a genuine existence. That being said, I have no assertion for you on whether it is good or bad to maintain separation or attempt to blend lifestyles. The only thing I might say is that perhaps there are situations where one is more appropriate. I think that perhaps my definition of home is a place where I am received favourably by my environment while successfully and honestly communicating an element of me.